Latest Editorials
Advertisers
Latest Comments
-
hotflash
-
.Sean
-
Michael Bersin
-
.Sean
-
.Sean
-
embarrassed in O Fallon
-
.Sean
Dear Ms. Dog,
I'm just a pup, but it seem to me that some big dogs get more than their share of the meaty bones.
Bowser
Latest Diaries
-
Hired Up Missouri
-
project vote
-
Cowboy
-
Cowboy
The Blunt Administration's Steady, Inexorable Rise to Utter Laughingstock Finally Complete
Instead of keeping his head down for the next seven months and maintaining whatever small measure of dignity remained, Matt Blunt went ahead today and released this gem:
Gov. Matt Blunt’s
office today issued a Sunshine request to Attorney General Jay Nixon’s
office seeking e-mail records from current and former employees of the
Attorney General’s office. The Governor’s office also stated it will
consider a lawsuit against the Attorney General’s office and the staff
members included in the open records request if they do not comply with
this open records request. ...Additionally, the
governor’s office is concerned that the Attorney General’s office is
not retaining every e-mail as Gov. Blunt’s office is doing, and that
they have failed to participate in the permanent e-mail retrieval
system the governor has created.
We are now experiencing governance according to the "I'm rubber and you're glue" theory of political dynamics. It's hard to imagine, frankly, that today's Blunt release was intended in seriousness and not a tongue-in-cheek jest.
Someone with an infinite amount of patience, a third grade reading-level vocabulary and a few hours to kill might try explaining to our governor why his tossed-off accusations against the Office of Attorney General are intrinsically distinct from the investigation currently underway into the record retention policies of the Governor's office. A recap of those reasons, in case they weren't evident from a simple reading of the painfully stupid release...
1. The suggestions today from Blunt are --by his own admission-- driven by "concern" on the part of the Governor's office. I'm sure the Governor's "concern" at this point is fully a product of earnest respect for the law rather than of petty spite and angry vengefulness. Maybe we could take the Governor's request seriously if it was based in, you know, evidence rather than in his "concern"?
2. The ongoing investigation into record retention and email deletion by the Blunt administration was generated as a result of allegations and accusations of wrongdoing by a former Blunt staffer who was himself involved in implementation of record retention policy. Basing an investigation on such allegations is considerably more logical meaningful than is basing one on groundless "concern" voiced by an individual against a political adversary.
3. Blunt accuses the Attorney General's office of "not retaining every email" and not participating in the "permanent email retrieval system" --things Blunt's been doing ever since he got caught deleting public records and failing to retrieve emails in connection with public record requests.
Even by the Blunt administration's notoriously low standards, today's release stands out as a low point. January can't come soon enough.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version











Simple
AG Nixon should tell Gov Blunt that the emails he is requesting will cost $540.000. The two bills cancel each other out and then each organization gets the requested emails.
Easy as pie.
Kind of reminds you of the crazed gunman....
.... who trys to "take some people with him" as he shoots up his place of work before turning the gun on himself.