Jones, Davis and Taitz File New Forged Kenyan Birth Certificate In Federal Court

Rep. Tim Jones (R-Eureka), Rep. Cynthia Davis (R-O'Fallon) and birther lawyer Orly Taitz have filed a new forged birth certificate in their ongoing lawsuit against Barack Obama in U.S. District Court.  Jones, Davis and their other plaintiffs have filed the new document "as a supplement" to their previously-filed evidence. 

The reasons for filing the obvious fraud aren't clear, considering their advancement of a competing forgery.  They seem to be arguing that since a lot of crazy people have crazy theories about the President's citizenship, they shouldn't be laughed out of court.

With the new birth certificate today, Taitz and the plaintiffs attached an explanation of how the document was allegedly obtained by a man named Lucas Daniel Smith. From Smith's declaration:

I traveled to Kenya and Mombasa in particular with the intent to obtain the original birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, as I was told previously that it was on file in the hospital and under seal, due to the fact that the prime minister of Kenya Raela Odinga is Barack Hussein Obama's cousin. 

I had to pay a cash “consideration” to a Kenyan military officer on duty to look the other way, while I obtained the copy of the birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama.

The copy was signed by the hospital administrator.

The copy contain the embossed seal.

The true and correct photocopy of the Birth certificate obtained, is attached to this affidavit as Exhibit A.

The new forged birth certificate:

Even the wackos at World Net Daily believe the document to be a fraud -- and that's saying something.

In their filing, Jones, Davis and Taitz state that they believe their evidence is being destroyed as part of some sort of conspiracy.

Plaintiffs fear that evidence relating to their cause may be destroyed as soon as it is identified as relevant to the questions relating to their lawsuit, and for this reason have asked the Court to consider allowing the Plaintiffs to take depositions pursuant to the “spirit” of Rule 27, even though a case has already been filed, but prior to the Rule 26(f) Conference which normally marks the initiation of formal discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Still incredible.

Jones and Davis need to explain why they continue to pursue these crazy conspiracies at taxpayer expense, or withdraw and apologize.