Have You Ever Wondered How Rep Cynthia Davis Talks To Her Fellow Republicans?

She is to be pitied more than censored. Why doesn't someone who cares about her do something?

When I see her ugly face  and read her inane comments it makes me wonder whether she has been artificially inseminated.  She's got seven known carriers of half of her gene collection while most of the rest of are using birth control-it's like reverse Darwinism-the survivial of the dumbest.

This entire debate is hilarious!  In the glory days of the Dems, when they ruled the roosts in Jefferson City and Bob Griffin was occupying the time of attorneys and investigators with widespread corruption charges (proven), where was the REST of the party?  Lurking in the back hallways, scared to even talk about corruption or call Shamed Former Speaker Griffin on HIS corruption.

Well, welcome to the debate, but don't think you're coming to it all very cleanly or without some icky stuff stuck to the bottom of your shoes -- think like that and you forget the past and will fail Missourians yet again.


 

Why is it, pray tell, that nine out of ten letters  to the editor (approximately), decrying the evil of abortion are written by men?  Kinda puts the lie to Sin-is-Bad Cynthia's position now, doesn't it, Hmmm?

Proudly Progressive;                   --Tammy

Okay, my blood has stopped boiling. Now, it's only simmering over this ninnying Neanderthal e-mail from this putated politician. The last time I read the Constitution it SAID "We the People..." blah-blah-blah secure the blessings of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" for all of us. Neither the Fifth Amenment nor the Fourteenth mention an income requirement. Why doesn't this lawmaker (note: I am really using this term loosely here) simply state what she really thinks -- that poor folks aren't entitled to have sex. They aren't entitled to have the "luxury" of making informed decisions about family planning; to choose the timing of when to bring a baby into the world or to enjoy a sexually-satisfying relationship unless it comes with shame. Shame by the truckload. What a horrible, twisted view of life. I pity her spouse -- if she has one. And jeez, what kind of mindset must her kids have about relationships? No doubt they are in need of some serious de-programming. Her views are also over-and-under inclusive at the same time. In the same pen stroke that she seeks to cut off all publically -funded access to contraceptives to the poor (They can't possible be married now can they?) she cuts off the access of low-income families too. There are so many wonderful things about Missouri (too numerous to list here -- except for the Katy Trail :) I realize Missouri has financial difficulties like so many other states. So, here's my idea. Tax stupidity! Set aside some of the money to educate people like this lawmaker who do not understand subject-verb agreement and the difference between singular and plural nouns. Her writing Certainly, people don't always speak gramamatically, but if they represent us in the legislature and they portray themselves as thoughtful, educated indivuduals, they should at least look that way when they write. Any way, I dare a lawmaker to introduce a bill taxing stupidity in Missouri. I bet just from this one lawmaker alone, it could be a big time revenue booster. And if that's not incentive enoug: think about using that extra moola to restore benefits to some of the hundreds of thousand whose Medicaid benefits have been pulled out from other them.

... frigid? I bet she was a real pip on a date.

You put your hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution. You don't put your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.

My God, we've spent 125 years convincing people that people can still have sex AND family planning and these people are undoing it all.

Poor Sinthia. Walking by the contraceptive aisle at Walgreen's must make her sooo hot, bothered, and confused.