Henchmen? Really?

Who knew?  Apparently, The Source is still an active blog.  I long ago stopped checking it, but a friend of mine pointed out that Jeff Roe wrote another of his screeds attacking me today.

I normally wouldn't bother to comment, as I treasure Jeff's disdain for me as a testament to my good character.

However, his comments today are worthy of a response.  In his most recent post, he refers to "Roy Temple and his henchmen." 

That is way out of line.  Henchmen?  Really?

That is profoundly unfair. 

I value my "henchwomen" just as much as I value my henchmen, and Jeff's suggestion to the contrary is simply unfounded. 

You would think that someone who is dedicating a substantial portion of his political efforts to an attempt to elect Missouri's first woman Governor would show more sensitivity to matters of gender.

But then again, some of his closest friends write stories like this about Sarah Steelman's "attributes,"  so it's hard to expect too much from him.

In the future, "henchpersons," please. 

Temple's Henchpersons

FiredUp! should sell T-shirts or Bumper Stickers:  Roy Temple Henchperson.  I'd buy one, but then again, I do whatever Roy tells me to.

Proud to be

I'm happy to be a henchperson for the cause. But, it seems to me that Roe deserves a takes-one-to-know-one on the henchman (henchperson) issue. I also wonder where a henchperson falls relative to a thug?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.