Have you ever embezzled money from your sorority? Have you ever suggested holding a wet t-shirt contest?

Submitted by Cole on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 1:13pm.

Matt Blunt released today the 111 questions he is asking Supreme Court nominees.

If you had expected him to have learned something during his tortured two and a half years of interviewing people, you would be... wrong.

Inexplicably, Blunt omitted questions that would have prevented him from repeating his past mistakes.  For example, Blunt neglects to ask these time tested questions:

Have you ever embezzled thousands of dollars from your sorority and plead guilty to felony stealing?

Have you ever called a female assistant your "show dog" and suggested a government sponsored wet t-shirt contest?

Perhaps Randa Hayes and Fred Ferrell helped draft the questions.


»

#41 Are you willing to relocate to Jeff City?

Submitted by Glic on Fri, 08/03/2007 - 9:33am.
I don't know....are YOU and your family ever going to relocate Gov Blunt?
»

I got 99 problems, but a Judge ain't one.

Submitted by J. Carter on Thu, 08/02/2007 - 11:13pm.
Everyone ought to read the 111 questions the Governor has sent to the judicial nominees. If you do, you'll realize it is simple harassment and an effort to trick someone by asking so many questions that are so broad there is no way you could answer them fully and say they were truthful. He's just trying to set them up. There's lots wrong with them, but furhter indicia of what he's up to is the request that they give information the Governor should already have, like how many opinions have been written and their retention votes in the last election. This stuff is all a matter of public record and any law clerk could look it up in about half an hour, yet he makes them answer the questions in hopes they will forget something. Reprehensible.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.