When Wright is Wrong

When Wright is Wrong
by Jean Carnahan

            I can’t believe I’m commenting on the Jeremiah Wright flapdoodle.   But since I’ve invested a couple of hours listening to the Moyers’ interview, Wright’s NAACP speech, and his Press Club debacle, I will tiptoe cautiously into the fray.

First, let me say that Wright’s remarks were despicable.  He alone should be held accountable for them—not Barack Obama; not the black church.   

I have sat in many a pew and listened to a revival preacher get carried away with the sound of his own voice.  Heaven forbid, that I would be held accountable for every bit of nonsense I have heard spewed from pulpits and podiums. 

But Obama remained at Trinity Church for twenty years, as his critics are quick to point out. While the Reverend sprinkled his sermons with droplets of truth, his messages were too often marred by jarring and divisive rhetoric.  As the Good Book suggests, there are times when we must sift the “wheat from the chaff,” which is apparently what parishioners—including the Obama family—did.  Like many church-going Catholics and Protestants today, he apparently found solace in a community of believers and relevance in their many laudable works. 

Barack has tried to be respectful of his former pastor—a fading religious icon whose words once gave him hope and whose accomplishments in the community were noteworthy.  But Wright did not return the respect.  As Maureen Dowd pointed out, Obama has  again been abandoned by the father figure in his life.

Apparently, Wright could not stand to see this young man move on to form his own ideas and solutions for bringing people together.  As one internet pundit put it: Wright is “old school” and he’s flunking out of “new school.”  But the registration of one million new Democratic voters tells us that something new is afoot. 

This election is shaping up as a massive contest between the “new” struggling to be born and the “old” refusing to yieldDuring this campaign, a host of new voters. volunteers, and contributors have joined the political arena largely because of the inspiration of Barack Obama and the change that he embodies.  Let’s hope that neither they nor he are turned off by the tone of this campaign.

In light of this pew/pulpit fiasco, here’s my advice to the Senator.  For spiritual guidance, stick with St. Paul, whose sermons have already been vetted.  Look to the apostle’s encouraging words to the Corinthians: “We are troubled on every side, yet not distressed; we are perplexed, but no in despair, persecuted, but not forsaken; cast down, but not destroyed.”

Hang in there.

 

If I read Wikipedia right,

Barack will be 47 in August.  He's not a kid and theoretically should be old enough to be able to deal with disappointment without falling apart. 

Registration of one million new democratic voters is probably the key statement in your essay.   I can understand your hope that you won't lose them but has it ever occurred to you that you got all those new voters not because Obama is so good but because Bush, Cheney, and the republicans are that bad?  Also, going beyond Wright and considering that according to wikipedia you're my mother's age, have you ever considered the possibility that "new" (who you are lining up with) is not necessarily better and that the "old" just might have seen something that you haven't?  

Rev. Wright is Obama's "Dean Scream"

Rev. Wright is Obama's "Dean Scream". Too bad for the Democrats downticket, as Wright is already being used against those who endorsed Obama. And I note that Hillary is now polling ahead in North Carolina, where Obama was previously up by 20 points. Obama will sink the Democrats like the Titanic, once the press decides that his negatives are ratings gold, and the Republicans realize his negatives are electoral gold.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.