Exclusive: Kinder Used Sham Continuing Committee to Retain Overlimit Contributions, Pay Campaign Bills

By Howard Beale
Created 07/21/2008 - 3:31pm

Campaign finance reports filed with the Missouri Ethics Commission by Peter Kinder's re-election campaign and a supposedly independent committee suggest that Kinder used an elaborate ploy to retrieve and utilize overlimit contributions raised between January and August of 2007 while campaign contribution limits were lifted.  Monies raised over the limits during that period were ordered returned to contributors by the Missouri Ethics Commission [1].

Ultimately, Kinder benefited by the use of more than $150,000 that had been returned to contributors by his campaign but later routed into another committee over which his campaign retained de facto control.

Kinder's ruse was premised on a simple idea: that tens of thousands of dollars returned to contributors who gave in excess of the limits while limits were lifted could be raised into another committee called Better Leadership for Missouri [2], and could then be spent by that committee on items and staff costs that were actually being used for Kinder's campaign.  As a practical matter, this allowed Kinder to benefit from the overlimit contributions without the dollars actually flowing through his campaign account.

As demonstrated below, Kinder's campaign violated the campaign finance laws by effectively controlling an outside committee and accepting illegal and unreported in-kind contributions in excess of the legal limits from that committee.

An examination of the campaign finance filings by both Kinder's campaign and by the Better Leadership for Missouri PAC leave little doubt that it the Better Leadership committee was used by Kinder or his staff both to re-solicit checks returned to contributors and to finance campaign infrastructure.

Consider that the following individuals or entities gave massive contributions to Kinder's campaign in 2007, had the overlimit portions of their contributions returned, and then gave to the Better Leadership for Missouri (BLM, hereinafter) committee:

Astute readers will notice that many of these contributors simply rewrote a check for the precise amount returned to them, as Kinder's campaign would have kept $1,275 from each overlimit donation (hence the givers of $10,000 who gave $8,725 to BLM, and so forth).  Others simply gave to BLM in the same amount of their initial overlimit commitment, as was the case with the Humphreys and Paul McKee.

Using this mechanism, Kinder was able to recoup into the Better Leadership for Missouri committee at least $152,300 in contributions that had to be returned by his own campaign.

But that's only half of the story.  Once the money was gathered back into the Better Leadership for Missouri committee beginning early in 2008, the committee began to spend the money on items and individuals that comprise the infrastructure of the Kinder campaign.  Some of the Better Leadership for Missouri expenditures really stand out.  Among them are...

There are several other curiosities as well. 

For instance, Better Leadership for Missouri pays rent to the J. Harris Company, sending a check in May for $3,300 and another in June for $660 [54].  Presumably, the rent is $660 per month and the May and June checks were for six months' rent.   Interestingly, the reports from Peter Kinder's own campaign show no [55] payments [56] for rent in 2008.

Another centers on a man named Jared Brown.  Brown gets paid by the Kinder campaign to do "grassroots development" and historically gets $4,000 every month ($4,000 on April 2, $4,000 on May 1, $4,000 on May 30 [57]).  However, in June (on the 12th) Jared Brown got only $2,000 from the campaign for grassroots development.  Fortunately for him, Better Leadership for Missouri was there to pick up the slack, hitting him with a check in amount of $2,000 for "grassroots development" [58] on the same day as the Kinder campaign and making him whole.

Finally, Better Leadership for Missouri bought computers.  $7,262.99 worth of them [59] between the dates of April 15, 2008 and May 29, 2008.   I wonder whose campaign is using those computers?

This is a lot of numbers and a lot of transactions.  But the upshot isn't confusing in the least.  Peter Kinder gamed the system so that he could use the no-limit contributions he raised and wasn't supposed to keep.  He has been accepting what amount to unreported, overlimit and illegal in-kind contributions to his campaign from Better Leadership for Missouri as the committee supplemented the pay of his staff and purchased goods and services intended for use by his campaign.  This is plainly violative of Missouri's campaign finance law.

But further, and more viscerally, the Better Leadership for Missouri committee is a complete and utter fiction on its face.  There is no entity, no campaign, no organization with staff or goals or communications on which the money being raised into the committee is being spent.  It is a slush fund whose only purpose is to allow a candidate to use cash without all the disclosure and transparency we deserve.

The people responsible will have excuses aplenty, but they knew what they were doing.  Collusive coordination of the sort we've seen in the reports of Friends of Peter Kinder and Better Leadership for Missouri isn't coincidental and doesn't happen without effort.  The folks who engineered these reporting farces should pay the price for having worked so hard to circumvent the rules. 


Source URL:
http://www.firedupmissouri.com/kinder_used_sham_committee_for_overlimits