Which Gets Vetted More Thoroughly?
Submitted by Howard Beale on Wed, 09/03/2008 - 7:11am.
So which gets a more thorough vetting: a member of a Missouri Supreme Court judicial panel selected by the appellate judicial commission or a Republican nominee for Vice President of the United States?
Does Governor Matt Blunt believe that a sufficient job of vetting his party's veep nominee was done with the barely investigated Palin when he has committed himself to deep, detailed investigations of the lives and careers of applicants for Missouri's highest bench? Isn't he outraged?
»
- Howard Beale's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer friendly version









McCain/Palin victory in November
Kevin is right....
Liberterian Kevin is right, the Repukes are headed for another victory, if we aren't careful. I have been super critical of some of the Democrat party members in the past and didn't even bother to read this website for a long long time. However, this is one of the most important elections in my lifetime, and I hate to see it lost.
Repukes like to get down and wallow in the slop (putting it nicely) and rub other peoples nose in it, all in the name of Christianity. They get by with it.
Its time for the Obama campaign to slam them every way possible. Their entire Repuke campaign so far is Karl Rove over and over.
We have nothing to lose but the election if we let them go. McCain needs to be slammed in the media about his past life and how he dumped his wife, remember all their ballyhoo about Bill Clinton. They will use it in a heart beat against us.
We have to take politics to their level to win I'm convinced.
This clown he named as a VP candidate has no more business being there than I do, but it shows her stupidity for accepting the nomination.
The only understand fighting fire with fire, and as for Joe Lieberman, someone please have a meeting and declare that he is no longer a Democrat and never will be again.
Good Question